DIP
Who we are and what this page is about
DIP works as an interdisciplinary methodology centre for European projects dealing with disinformation, loneliness, mental health, values, democratic dialogue, creativity and youth resilience.
We do not offer “one more theory” or “just workshops”. Our role in EU consortia is to provide a coherent methods and metrics cluster that makes complex social processes:
Explainable – with clear maps and narratives rather than abstract labels.
Predictable – by identifying recurring patterns and transitions.
Reproducible – through structured protocols and flows that can be replicated across countries.
Measurable – by linking practice to indicators, profiles and indices.
The tools below are already used in practice and can be integrated into Horizon, Erasmus+ and CERV projects as ready-made modules for Labs, training and evaluation.
Track record and European context
Over the last years, elements of this methodology have been used in:
youth and community programmes,
higher education settings,
counselling and retreat formats,
civic dialogue and disinformation-related activities,
creative Labs combining arts, movement and reflection
in several European countries, including [countries to insert], with [approximate number] groups and [approximate number] individual cases.
In EU-funded projects, consortia often have strong partners in content (universities, NGOs, fact-checkers), but lack a unifying methodological backbone. DIP fills this gap by bringing a configuration-based toolkit that can be applied consistently in different countries and linked to both qualitative and quantitative evaluation.
countries
groups
cases
Methodological principles
Interdisciplinary by design
Real problems cut across psychology, education, media studies, sociology, arts and policy. Our methods are explicitly designed to work between disciplines, not inside a single silo.
Configuration and tension-based thinking We analyse situations as configurations of tensions, roles and contexts (individual–group–society–media), rather than as isolated variables. This allows us to work with phenomena such as polarization, loneliness, manipulation or creative blocks in a structured way.
Practice-based, science-aligned The models come from many years of practice in counselling, group work, creative Labs and educational programmes. Where possible, tools are anchored in existing theories and scales (e.g. loneliness, wellbeing, values, creativity); where this is not yet done, we treat them as pilots to be further formalised together with academic partners.
From model to metric Each method is developed with a clear line: concept → map or protocol → observable indicators → simple indices or profiles. This makes it possible to use our tools both for learning processes and for evaluation.
Creativity as a method, not decoration We use creative formats (scenes, role-play, drawing, movement, narrative exercises) not as “nice add-ons”, but as structured methods for accessing complex states and configurations that are difficult to reach through questionnaires alone. Creative outputs are treated as data: they are mapped, coded and connected to indicators.
Ethics, safety and data protection All methods are adapted to European standards for informed consent, anonymity/pseudonymisation, safeguarding and data protection (GDPR). When working with youth or sensitive topics (e.g. trauma, mental health, political views), we combine methodological depth with clear risk management and referral pathways.
Validation as a process We distinguish clearly between tools that are experimental, piloted, or ready for broader use. EU projects are used not only to apply the methods, but also to test and refine them under real conditions.
Overview of the DIP Method Toolkit
For European consortia, we structure our toolkit into five thematic clusters. Below is a concise overview; detailed protocols and templates are available upon collaboration.
4.1. Disinformation, Influence and Manipulation
Narrative Distortion Map Maps how harmful narratives form, spread and attach to specific vulnerabilities in a community, across channels (offline, social media, messaging apps).
Manipulation Pattern Cards A set of cards that classify manipulation types (emotional, identity-based, authority, uncertainty, reward–punishment) in language accessible to young people and practitioners.
Loop & Exposure Mapping Tool Visualises feedback loops around media use (doomscrolling, outrage, addiction, identity-trigger loops) and helps identify points where these loops can be redirected. These tools are used in Labs and trainings on media literacy, disinformation and civic resilience and can be combined with standard measures of media use, wellbeing and trust.
4.2 Values, Inner Compass and Resilience
Values in Motion Cards Explores values as dynamic tensions (e.g. safety–exploration, autonomy–belonging) rather than static lists, linking them to real-life decisions and dilemmas.
Value–Action Consistency Map Helps individuals and groups see where declared values align or conflict with everyday practices (e.g. “we value inclusion” vs. who actually participates).
Protective & Risk Values Profile Distinguishes values that protect against manipulation and polarization (curiosity, plurality, humility) from those that can be exploited (purity, absolute loyalty), producing a simple protective/risk profile.
These tools support youth work, leadership programmes and democratic education, and can be connected to established value frameworks and openness/authoritarianism scales.
4.3. Loneliness, Vulnerability and Mental Health
Loneliness Configuration Map Analyses how social, emotional and digital factors combine into “loneliness configurations” (isolation, unmet needs, unrealistic expectations, digital substitution of contact).
Vulnerability Profile (Light Version) Screens vulnerability across four dimensions – identity, belonging, emotional regulation and digital exposure – in a non-stigmatising, conversation-friendly way.
Emotional–Tension Axes Uses axes such as expression–protection, certainty–uncertainty, contact–withdrawal to link emotional experience with concrete life contexts (study, work, online, family).
These tools are applied in student support, youth programmes and community work, and can be aligned with standard loneliness, wellbeing or resilience scales in evaluation work packages.
4.4. Dialogue, Democratic Culture and Cross-cutting Tools
Dialogue Positioning Grid Maps how individuals and groups show up in dialogue (closed–open, reactive–reflective, adversarial–co-creative), providing a basis for designing safer conversations and tracking change.
Conflict Polarity Map Structures polarised issues by making visible each side’s concerns, fears and legitimate needs, and the potential “third options” or shared ground.
Configuration Map for Complex Social Systems A cross-cutting tool to map roles, tensions and contexts across levels (individual, group, organisation, ecosystem), used for project design, evaluation frameworks and strategic planning.
These instruments support democratic dialogue, conflict-sensitive processes and systemic project design, and serve as a backbone into which more formal indicators and scales can be plugged.
4.5. Creativity, Imagination and Collective Sense-making
Creative Scene Mapping Participants construct short scenes (verbal, written or enacted) that capture key tensions in their context (e.g. a typical online conflict, a moment of exclusion, a breakthrough in cooperation). These scenes are then analysed as configurations: who is present, which forces act, where the loop closes.
5 Keys of Creative Act A structured method that looks at creativity through five dimensions (tension, trigger, act, transformation, environment), helping individuals and groups understand how creative change actually happens in their lives and communities.
Collective Story & Image Labs Group-based processes where participants co-create stories, drawings or simple performative moments to explore future scenarios, shared values or fears. Outputs are not treated as “art therapy”, but as data for sense-making: patterns are coded and linked back to values, emotions and configurations.
These tools are used in youth work, education, cultural and innovation projects, where creativity is both a resource and an indicator of resilience. They are designed to complement more traditional measures by capturing aspects of experience that do not easily fit into standard questionnaires.
Ethics, safety and documentation
All methods are accompanied by:
clear facilitation guidelines, including how to adapt intensity to different groups,
ethical checklists for informed consent, anonymity/pseudonymisation and data storage,
recommendations for safeguarding and referral when sensitive topics arise (e.g. self-harm, trauma, discrimination),
templates for session reports that allow partners to document processes in a comparable way.
Where projects require it, we collaborate with ethics committees and data protection officers to ensure alignment with European and national regulations.
How DIP contributes to European consortia
In Horizon, Erasmus+ and CERV projects, DIP typically contributes in three main ways:
Methodological backbone We provide an integrated framework and toolkit that give the consortium a common language and structure across countries and work packages.
Operational tools for Labs and interventions We co-design and adapt Lab formats, workshops and consulting flows, ensuring that they are practically usable for local partners and aligned with ethical and safeguarding standards.
Support for metrics and evaluation Together with academic partners, we help translate complex phenomena into profiles, indicators and simple indices, which can be used in baseline, midline and endline measurements and in comparative analysis. In this role, DIP functions as a methodology-first partner, bringing a coherent set of tools and concepts that strengthen the excellence, impact and implementation dimensions of European projects, while at the same time building a cumulative evidence base on how complex social systems change over time.